Skip to main content

UN WOMEN – MARKING THE WAY TO GENDER EQUALITY


On July 2 of the current year, UN Women (www.unwomen.org) will mark its seventh anniversary. Although there have been previous UN groups that focused on so-called “women’s issues” dating back 40 years, it is worth noting that it took until a decade into the 21st century for gender equality and empowerment to rise to the level of a comprehensive worldwide program of action. But...better late than never.

Best known as UN Women, the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women first became operational in January of 2011, following its formation in July of the year before. Previously, there were a number of departments throughout the UN bureaucracy that were charged with catering to women’s survival, development and empowerment needs, but only within the context of unrelated programs.
In a 2006 report on the state of women worldwide, the office of the UN Secretary-General resolved that, in effect, less wasn’t more, and that the multiple UN systems already in place with the goal of contributing to gender equality and the empowerment of women should continue to carry out their work, but that a new overarching entity should be created, whose job it would be to sharpen and underscore the focus and impact of gender equality activities throughout the UN as a whole. The Secretary-General’s report estimated that the new entity would require a half-billion-dollar annual budget in the initial stages between start-up costs and requests for funding at a local country-level.
But it would take another four years of negotiations among UN member states and other stakeholders before a draft resolution could be drawn up and presented to the UN General Assembly. Resolution No. 64/286 was finally passed with unanimous support on July 2, 2010, with UN Women being formed through the merging of the UN’s Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW), the International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (founded in 1976), the Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women (OSAGI, in operation since 1997), and the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM, established in 1976). Like UNIFEM before it, UN Women became, in turn, a member of the United Nations Development Group.
Although originally begun in 1976 as a “voluntary fund” to support the “United Nations Decade for Women”, UNIFEM garnered a somewhat expanded mandate in 1985, and had been working for four decades with women’s organizations in countries around the world in the development of programs to support gender equality and the empowerment of women. But it wasn’t until 20 years in, during the 1990s, that it achieved the backing to develop gender-responsive budgets for its extensive work in regions including southern and eastern Africa, southern and southeastern Asia, Central America and the Andean region.
When the resolution creating UN Women was finally passed, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon thanked members states for what he called “this major step forward for the world's women and girls,” adding that “UN Women will significantly boost UN efforts to promote gender equality, expand opportunity, and tackle discrimination around the globe.”
UN Women’s mandate is an ambitious one. Besides overseeing the other United Nations gender equality and advancement agencies mentioned, it is also charged with leading, coordinating and promoting the UN’s work and accountability in the field of gender equality and women’s empowerment. Its ultimate goal is to enhance rather than replace other specific gender-related efforts within the United Nations organization including those of UNICEF, the UN Development Program and the UN Population Fund.
Overlapping areas of interest that fall under UN Women’s management and scrutiny for the advancement of women include, among others, leadership and political participation, economic empowerment, measures to end violence against women, humanitarian actions, peace and security, national planning and governance, sustainable development and HIV-AIDS prevention and treatment.
UN Women makes use of the social networks in its outreach, but goes far beyond, taking such direct action as creating a database that examines national constitutions from a feminist viewpoint, mapping rules and principles that deny the rights of women and girls, as well as those that protect women’s rights worldwide. The idea is for this database to provide a tool to human and women’s rights activists worldwide, in order to help them form a clear view of areas in which their help is required and to create plans of action designed to spark and support positive change.
In addition, UN Women works directly to support intergovernmental bodies in creating policies that adhere to international standards and norms for the protection, and advancement of women and girls. The agency also helps member states implement such standards and develop monitoring systems to track bilateral accountability.
Clearly, despite the long way women have come worldwide since the 20th century, on a global scale, their advancement, empowerment and quest for equality is still in the dawning stages even in the world’s most advanced countries. And the founding of UN Women seven years ago is a landmark on that road, ensuring that something is being done at a worldwide level to guarantee that the world’s nations keep advancing toward the ultimate goal of equal rights and opportunities for all.         


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MILTON FRIEDMAN: A CONSERVATIVE VOICE FOR FREE MONEY FOR ALL

Milton Friedman Milton Friedman, who died in 2006 at the age of 94, was for decades considered, a leading US economist, who garnered worldwide renown. Winner of the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his many achievements, Friedman criticized traditional Keynesian economics as “naïve” and reinterpreted many of the economic theories broadly accepted up to his era. He was an outspoken free market capitalist who acted as an honored adviser to emblematically ultra-conservative world leaders such as US President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and his theories on such key areas as monetary policy, privatization and deregulation exercised a major influence on the governing policies of many Western governments and multilateral organizations in the 1980s and ‘90s. Such a staunch conservative would seem like an unlikely academic to go to in search of backing for the controversial idea of giving spending money away to every person and family, no strin

UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME—INTRODUCTION TO A CONTROVERSY WHOSE DAY IS COMING

For some time now, the warning signs have been clear to anyone studying the evolution of free-market economies worldwide. Job creation is not keeping pace with job attrition and demographic expansion. The tendency is toward a world with ever more people and ever fewer jobs. While most politicians and world leaders praise the technological revolution that has served up extraordinary advances to billions the world over, the dwindling sources of legitimate employment belie optimism for the average individual’s future work possibilities. Among possible solutions, one of the most salient is the controversial idea of some sort of basic “allowance” to ensure coverage of people’s personal needs. But this is an idea that is still in its infancy, while its practical application may be more urgently required than is generally presumed. In Western capitalist society there has long been a conservative idea that the capitalist makes money through investment and that the worker makes a living wi

A CASTRO BY ANY OTHER NAME...

Although many Western observers are already showing optimism over the semi-retirement of Raúl Castro and the rise to office of the previously obscure Miguel Díaz Canel, what just happened in Cuba is not a regime change. In fact, for the moment, it appears that very little will change in that island nation, including the severe restriction of human and civil rights with which Cubans have been living for the past six decades. Miguel Díaz Canel While it is true that Díaz Canel is the first person other than Fidel and Raúl Castro in nearly 60 years to ostensibly take charge of the country, he was handpicked by Raúl to ensure the continuation of a Castro dynasty that has been ensconced in power since the end of the Cuban Revolution in 1959. He has garnered Castro's favor by eschewing personal power quests and adhering to the regime’s main political and economic lines in his most recent post as the country’s First Vice-President, after long years as a grassroots regime champion