Skip to main content

SCHOLAS OCCURRENTES IN THE VATICAN: EDUCATING FOR PEACE

Vatican City
This week, I’ve had the enormous pleasure of being invited to take part in the Fourth Scholas Occurrentes World Congress at the Vatican, a project that bears the seal of Pope Francis. Within the context of this invitation, I also had the honor of being asked to present my book, El crimen de la guerra (soon to be released in English as War: A Crime Against Humanity), the message of which is in perfect harmony with that of the Scholas mission: the consolidation of peace through education and through acceptance of human diversity.
I had the honor of presenting my book in this
Vatican hall. Pope Francis will speak here
tomorrow. 
Here in Rome, we’re anxiously awaiting the closing presentation headed by His Holiness, Pope Francis.
Scholas Ocurrentes is a worldwide educational network inspired by the Pope with the aim of promoting the linking of schools from all over the world in a huge network. The idea is for a wide variety of learning centers to share their projects and, in doing so, to mutually enrich one another. Although the guiding idea is to create a rich dialogue among schools of all kinds, the project places special focus on providing the kind of help such networks can generate to schools with low resource levels, so as to eventually create education without exclusion.
Despite the support provided by the Vatican and by the Pontiff himself, this network is not oriented toward only connecting schools found in Christian majority nations. On the contrary, according to José María del Corral, Worldwide Director of Scholas Occurrentes, “The best result to date was for the experiments we did when the Pope was Archbishop of Buenos Aires and we brought together kids from schools with different religions, Jewish schools, and Catholic schools, and Islamic schools...and we tried an experiment that we called ‘neighbors’ schools’. And there they learned what real co-existence was, what different points of view were, different beliefs and projects and they built solutions based on the difficulties they had, like alcohol, drugs, insecurity, violence.”
And this is where the philosophy of my book, War: A Crime Against Humanity, coincides completely with this congress in which I have had the honor of participating. In my essay turned book, I propose that the world can no longer afford to back any policy that includes war. If we can’t find a way to live in peace and devote ourselves to solving in a completely universal way the social and environmental problems that are afflicting us as a planetary family, then we will have to confront the specter of our own extinction as a species. And the only way to achieve the worldwide peace, of which we are so gravely in need, is through education.
The conference in which I am taking part this week addresses the core issue of educating for peace through sports, art and technology, the three pillars of Scholas, which has already morphed into a worldwide network of 400,000 schools. This project also coincides with another one (currently in the planning stages) in which I am working with former Chief Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court, Dr. Luis Moreno Ocampo, through which we eventually hope to achieve the creation of a worldwide network of teachers specializing in peace and justice studies. Through this worldwide network, these educators will share materials and methodologies for teaching peaceful and empathic behavior, so as to create, in the short, medium and long terms, a more peaceful world, and one in which war will be considered a crime against humanity, punishable by law and condemned the world over.
In the coming days, I will continue to write about this magnificent event and, next up, I will have news of Pope Francis’s presentation.
In the meantime, peace be with you.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MILTON FRIEDMAN: A CONSERVATIVE VOICE FOR FREE MONEY FOR ALL

Milton Friedman Milton Friedman, who died in 2006 at the age of 94, was for decades considered, a leading US economist, who garnered worldwide renown. Winner of the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his many achievements, Friedman criticized traditional Keynesian economics as “naïve” and reinterpreted many of the economic theories broadly accepted up to his era. He was an outspoken free market capitalist who acted as an honored adviser to emblematically ultra-conservative world leaders such as US President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and his theories on such key areas as monetary policy, privatization and deregulation exercised a major influence on the governing policies of many Western governments and multilateral organizations in the 1980s and ‘90s. Such a staunch conservative would seem like an unlikely academic to go to in search of backing for the controversial idea of giving spending money away to every person and family, no strin

UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME—INTRODUCTION TO A CONTROVERSY WHOSE DAY IS COMING

For some time now, the warning signs have been clear to anyone studying the evolution of free-market economies worldwide. Job creation is not keeping pace with job attrition and demographic expansion. The tendency is toward a world with ever more people and ever fewer jobs. While most politicians and world leaders praise the technological revolution that has served up extraordinary advances to billions the world over, the dwindling sources of legitimate employment belie optimism for the average individual’s future work possibilities. Among possible solutions, one of the most salient is the controversial idea of some sort of basic “allowance” to ensure coverage of people’s personal needs. But this is an idea that is still in its infancy, while its practical application may be more urgently required than is generally presumed. In Western capitalist society there has long been a conservative idea that the capitalist makes money through investment and that the worker makes a living wi

A CASTRO BY ANY OTHER NAME...

Although many Western observers are already showing optimism over the semi-retirement of Raúl Castro and the rise to office of the previously obscure Miguel Díaz Canel, what just happened in Cuba is not a regime change. In fact, for the moment, it appears that very little will change in that island nation, including the severe restriction of human and civil rights with which Cubans have been living for the past six decades. Miguel Díaz Canel While it is true that Díaz Canel is the first person other than Fidel and Raúl Castro in nearly 60 years to ostensibly take charge of the country, he was handpicked by Raúl to ensure the continuation of a Castro dynasty that has been ensconced in power since the end of the Cuban Revolution in 1959. He has garnered Castro's favor by eschewing personal power quests and adhering to the regime’s main political and economic lines in his most recent post as the country’s First Vice-President, after long years as a grassroots regime champion